![]() |
Enfield Liberal Democrats The REAL Alternative in Enfield |
| Enfield Liberal Democrats | <info@enfieldlibdems.org.uk> |
112 Olympic jobs for local unemployed people is a disgrace - Dee Doocey1.09.00pm BST (GMT +0100) Wed 21st Oct 2009 The low level of jobs for locally unemployed people was highlighted at City Hall today by Dee Doocey, the Liberal Democrat London Assembly Olympics spokesperson. Questioning the Chief Executive and the Chairman of the Olympics Delivery Authority (ODA) Dee Doocey pressed for significant improvements in the record of unemployed people being offered training and work on the Olympic Park. At present just 112 of the 4,5000 working on the park are people from neighbouring boroughs, who were previously unemployed. In addition there are just 69 apprenticeships on the park. Commenting Dee said: "There are 46,000 unemployed people in the boroughs surrounding the park and sadly that figure is continuing to rise. It is therefore scandalous that with 4,500 jobs created in the park a pitiful 112 have gone to unemployed people who live locally. "The ODA cannot hide behind national comparisons with other building sites. The 2012 Games had a specific task to provide a legacy, which must include new work and training opportunities for unemployed Londoners who live near to the park. It is time the ODA rose to the challenge and delivered a real employment legacy from the Olympics." Ends
Bookmark this story at:
Related News Stories:Thu 29th Jul 2010: Wed 17th Feb 2010: Thu 21st Jan 2010: Exclusive ticketing deal for Olympic Games slammed by Dee Doocey. Wed 15th Jul 2009: 'Olympic Family' Must Use Public Transport - Dee Doocey. Tue 7th Apr 2009: Olympic legacy is all talk and no action - Dee Doocey. Thu 5th Feb 2009: 'Olympic legacy must become a reality' - Dee Doocey. Tue 21st Oct 2008: 112 Olympics jobs for local unemployed people is a disgrace - Dee Doocey. Published and promoted by Brian Cronk on behalf of Enfield Liberal Democrats, all at 37 Hillcrest, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1AT The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |